AI Choice Board Generator for Middle School
Middle school is where student learning differences become more visible and more consequential (and where a single identical assignment is least likely to serve the full range of learners in the room. A 7th-grade class might span students reading at 4th-grade level and students reading at 10th-grade level, students with IEPs and students identified as gifted, students who need kinesthetic processing and students who thrive with text. The AI Choice Board Generator creates differentiated, UDL-aligned choice boards for grades 6–8) complete 3×3 grids with activities across modalities, student-facing instructions, and drafts to print for any subject.
This page fills in a draft from a template. Copy prompt gives you the prompt for any AI chat.
- 3 by 3, two columns, must-do and may-do
- 3 formats
How teachers use it for middle school
Example classroom scenarios where choice boards change how students demonstrate learning.
Ms. Hoffman's 7th-grade ELA RAFT choice board
Ms. Hoffman generates a draft and turns it into a RAFT matrix for the "Romeo and Juliet" unit. Roles: Romeo, Juliet, Friar Lawrence, a modern teen. Audiences: Juliet's parents, the Prince of Verona, a friend, a future generation. Formats: letter, text message exchange, speech, social media post. Topics: the feud, the secret marriage, the plan, the final scene. Every student in her class of 32 (including 6 ELL students and 4 students with IEPs) completes a unique task grounded in the same text. The teacher grades all combinations against the same rubric assessing textual evidence and character understanding.
Mr. Chen's 8th-grade science differentiated board
Mr. Chen generates a 3×3 board for a cell biology unit and edits it into tiers. Tier 1 activities (label a cell diagram, create a matching card set of organelles and functions, watch a video and write 5 facts) are tagged to students working below grade level. Tier 2 (write a comparison of plant and animal cells, create a model, explain protein synthesis in 3 steps) targets grade-level students. Tier 3 (design an experiment testing the effect of osmosis, evaluate a flawed lab procedure, write an original analogy explaining mitosis) reaches his 4 gifted students. All tiers target the same standard; only the cognitive demand differs.
Ms. Park's 6th-grade social studies culminating task
Ms. Park replaces her traditional end-of-unit test for the Ancient Egypt unit with a tic-tac-toe choice board. Students must complete 3 activities in a row (ensuring every student addresses government, religion, and geography through their chosen activities, regardless of which combination they pick. Ask in the learning goal and the AI can structure the board so every possible tic-tac-toe line covers all three content areas.
- No student accounts.
- No ads.
- Data-processing agreement on request.
What this page does here
This page builds a draft from a template on this device. Copy prompt gives you the prompt for any AI chat.
Questions teachers ask
How do I prevent students from always choosing the easiest activities?
For tic-tac-toe boards, structure the grid so students must complete activities from at least two different Bloom's levels to complete 3 in a row, the AI can set this constraint automatically. For open boards where students choose any activity, assign minimum requirements: every student must complete at least one activity from each row. For tiered boards where activities are grouped by readiness, assign students to tiers before distributing the board and give each student a copy with only their tier's activities.
Can I use the RAFT format for subjects other than ELA?
Yes. RAFT works for any subject where students can take a perspective and communicate to an audience. For science: Role (scientist, cell, molecule), Audience (the public, a policy maker, a student), Format (lab report, news article, analogy), Topic (climate change, cell division, Newton's laws). For history: Role (historical figure, journalist, modern citizen), Audience (the King, the public, a future historian), Format (letter, speech, documentary script), Topic (the event, its causes, its consequences). The combinations create unique, meaningful tasks for every student.
How do I grade choice boards when students complete different activities?
All activities on the board should be designed to assess the same learning objectives, just through different modalities and formats. Create a single rubric that evaluates the underlying learning objective (e.g., "demonstrates understanding of the causes of the Civil War using specific evidence") regardless of which activity format was chosen. Grade every activity against the same rubric. The format is different; the standard is the same.
Can I differentiate choice boards for ELL students in middle school?
Yes. The AI can generate a version of each activity with simplified language (shorter sentences, tier-1 vocabulary, visual supports indicated) for ELL students. For the same learning objective, an ELL-modified activity might provide a sentence frame or a word bank alongside the activity instructions. The cognitive demand stays the same, ELL students are not given simpler content, just more accessible language scaffolds. Teachers can generate the standard version, then ask for simpler language in the Learning goal field to generate an ELL-modified version.
How long should middle school students spend on each choice board activity?
Most middle school choice board activities are designed to be completed in one to two class periods (45–90 minutes). For multi-week units, consider a larger board (9–12 activities) where students complete 3–4 over the course of the unit. For a single class period, a 4-activity mini-board with a 20-minute time allocation per activity is appropriate. The form has no time field, so adjust activity scope to your time frame when you edit the draft.
Related tools
AI with your school's own student and course data is part of OpenEduCat.
Book a demoCounted per page. Report a problem for bugs.