AI Peer Review Helper for English Language Learners
Peer review for English language learners requires scaffolding that goes beyond what standard tools offer. An ELL student at proficiency Level 2 cannot write meaningful feedback in English using open-ended prompts, but they have clear perceptions of what is working and not working in a peer's writing. The AI Peer Review Helper gives a guide at the English language learners level that you can adapt: prompts written at the appropriate English proficiency level, sentence starters in the student's home language, and review structures that allow ELL students to contribute meaningfully rather than being excluded.
This page fills in a draft from a template. Copy prompt gives you the prompt for any AI chat.
How ELL and language support teachers Use It
Peer review scenarios, not generic examples.
An ELL teacher implements peer review for 24 students across three proficiency levels
An ELL teacher has 24 students at three different English proficiency levels. She uses the AI Peer Review Helper's guide and makes a version for each level. From the AI's draft she writes three versions of the review scaffold (one per level), all reviewing the same assignment but with prompts and sentence starters matched to each level. Level 2 students receive bilingual sentence starters she adds in their home language. Level 4 students receive standard prompts with English starters. All 24 students can participate.
Using bilingual sentence starters to enable peer review for newly arrived students
A recently arrived Grade 7 student from Mexico is in her first month of English instruction. The student receives sentence starters in both Spanish and English. She writes her feedback in Spanish, which the teacher can read. Her observations are genuinely useful, her understanding of what makes writing clear is strong, even though her English production is still developing.
Building academic language through structured sentence starters
An ELL coordinator works with a group of Grade 9 students who are academically capable but still developing academic English register. She uses the AI Peer Review Helper's guide to run a series of activities designed to build academic language. Each activity provides sentence starters that model a different academic language function, describing, evaluating, suggesting, questioning. Over six sessions, students begin to use the stems independently in their own feedback, not just in the prompted review.
- No student accounts.
- No ads.
- Data-processing agreement on request.
What this page does here
This page builds a draft from a template on this device. Copy prompt gives you the prompt for any AI chat.
Questions teachers ask
Can the AI generate peer review scaffolds matched to specific English proficiency levels?
Yes. There is no Proficiency-Calibrated mode, but you can edit the draft into versions at different proficiency levels, matching vocabulary, sentence structure, and prompt complexity to the level. You can use WIDA, CEFR, or other frameworks to guide this.
Are sentence starters available in languages other than English?
Yes. You can add starters in the home language; for students at early proficiency levels, this allows them to participate meaningfully while their English production is still developing.
Can newly arrived students participate in peer review with this tool?
Yes. For students at the earliest proficiency stages, the template's fill-in-the-blank starters help, and you add full bilingual support. Newly arrived students can observe and respond to peer work rather than being excluded.
Does the quality checker apply to ELL feedback?
There is no quality checker here. English language learners is a Level choice, and the guide gives simple sentence starters. Decide what you accept from each student yourself, including any home language writing.
Can the tool support activities designed to build academic language skills?
Yes. There is no Academic Language Building mode, but the guide's starters model academic language functions (evaluating, describing, suggesting, questioning), and you can add more, as a way of building academic register through the peer review activity itself.
Related tools
AI with your school's own student and course data is part of OpenEduCat.
Book a demoCounted per page. Report a problem for bugs.